How to Choose the Right Jurisdiction for Asset Management License

Published
10/19/2024

Such a permit as asset management license allows firms and individuals to legally manage investments, including securities, real estate, fiat money, crypto-currency and other types of assets, on behalf of clients. These licenses typically permit a wide range of activities such as fund management, wealth management, portfolio management and investment advice. The exact scope of an asset management license varies from one jurisdiction to another, and not all countries regulate asset management in the same way. Therefore, the jurisdiction you choose for your asset management license will determine the range of activities you can undertake, the regulatory requirements, and the level of oversight you’ll be subject to. If you require advice on issues related to this topic or regarding obtaining an asset management license in the UK, our experts are at your service to provide comprehensive answers.

 

Criteria for Choosing a Jurisdiction for Asset Management

Choosing the right jurisdiction for obtaining your asset management license is one of the most important strategic decisions you will make. Here are some criteria you should consider next-mentioned.

Regulatory frameworks asset management

A favorable regulatory framework is critical for asset management firms. Some jurisdictions offer more stringent regulations, while others offer more flexible ones. You need to balance regulatory clarity with ease of doing business.

  1. Strict Regulation: These jurisdictions often provide strong investor protection, but compliance costs can be high. This may be suitable for larger firms looking to build trust with institutional clients.
  2. Light financial regulations asset management: These offer fewer regulatory hurdles, but the perceived lack of oversight can deter institutional clients and raise concerns about legitimacy.

 

Jurisdictions Where Investors are Located

The location of investors plays a crucial role in choosing a jurisdiction. Asset managers must consider tax laws, regulatory frameworks, and cross-border investment rules specific to where their investors reside. 

Some countries may have stringent rules on foreign investments or different reporting requirements, so selecting a jurisdiction that aligns with these legal obligations can simplify compliance and improve investor confidence.

Amount of Investors

The total number of investors affects how a fund or asset management entity is structured. Jurisdictions often have regulations around the maximum number of investors for different types of funds (e.g., retail vs. private). For example, some jurisdictions impose limits on the number of investors in private funds to maintain specific legal or tax benefits. A higher number of investors might push the structure toward being classified as a public offering, necessitating a more regulated and transparent framework.

Is the Offering Public or Private?

Whether the offering is public or private determines the level of regulation and disclosure required. 

  1. Public offerings typically require adherence to stricter regulatory oversight, including registering with the relevant securities regulators, frequent reporting, and greater transparency. 
  2. Private offerings, on the other hand, are subject to fewer regulations but are generally limited to accredited or institutional investors. This impacts the jurisdiction chosen, as some regions are more favorable for private offerings due to lighter regulatory burdens.

 

Minimal Amount of Investment

The minimum investment threshold can influence the jurisdiction. Certain regions cater to high-net-worth investors or institutional clients and have frameworks that support large-scale investments, which may reduce the compliance burden for larger investors. 

Jurisdictions with higher minimum investment requirements often offer more favorable tax treatment or lighter regulation, while those targeting smaller investors tend to impose stricter protections and oversight. Selecting the right jurisdiction involves balancing regulatory costs with investor expectations.

Reputation

The reputation of a jurisdiction is important both for client confidence and regulatory compliance. Jurisdictions with a solid track record in financial services tend to be more attractive.

  1. Reputable jurisdictions: Countries like Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom offer a strong reputation for financial services and regulatory compliance.
  2. Emerging jurisdictions: Regions like Dubai, BVI or the Cayman Islands may be attractive for their flexibility but may require a bit more effort to gain global client trust.

 

Tax Efficiency

Taxation is one of the most influential factors when choosing a jurisdiction for asset management. Some jurisdictions offer asset management tax benefits, capital gains exemptions, or other tax incentives aimed at attracting asset management firms.

Operational Ease

  1. Language: Ensure that the official language in the jurisdiction aligns with your operational language.
  2. Legal Framework: A business-friendly legal system with clear corporate laws is crucial for smooth operations.
  3. Cost: Consider the cost of setup and ongoing operations in the jurisdiction, including employee salaries, office space, and legal fees.

 

Jurisdiction comparison analysis

Here, we compare some of the leading jurisdictions for asset management licenses based on the factors discussed earlier.

Switzerland

  1. Regulation: Highly stringent regulations under FINMA, Switzerland's financial market regulator.
  2. Reputation: Switzerland is known for its long-standing reputation in wealth management.
  3. Tax: Relatively high corporate tax rates, but tax treaties with multiple countries make it efficient for cross-border operations.

 

Cayman Islands

  1. Regulation: Less stringent than European jurisdictions, regulated by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA).
  2. Reputation: Well-regarded for offshore funds but sometimes criticized for being a tax haven.
  3. Tax: No direct corporate taxes, making it a popular choice for hedge funds and asset managers.

 

United Kingdom

  1. Regulation: High regulatory standards under the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), ensuring strong investor protection.
  2. Reputation: London is a global financial hub with a well-regarded legal and regulatory system.
  3. Tax: While the corporate tax rate is moderate, the UK offers various tax reliefs for financial service providers.

 

Singapore

  1. Regulation: Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), offering a balanced approach to regulation.
  2. Reputation: Strong reputation in Asia and globally, especially for wealth management.
  3. Tax: Singapore offers favorable tax treaties and corporate tax rates, plus various incentives for financial firms.

 

Dubai (UAE)

  1. Regulation: Regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), offering a flexible regulatory environment.
  2. Reputation: An emerging hub for financial services in the Middle East, gaining increasing credibility.
  3. Tax: No personal income tax and no corporate tax, which is a major draw for asset management firms.

 

 

Regulatory Frameworks and Their Impact on Business Operations

Each jurisdiction’s regulatory framework will have a significant impact on your business operations. Key regulatory considerations include next-mentioned.

1. Licensing Procedures.

Some jurisdictions have complex, time-consuming licensing processes. For example, in Switzerland and the UK, getting a license may take several months due to stringent background checks and the need for a robust compliance program. In contrast, jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands offer faster licensing procedures with fewer regulatory requirements.

2. Compliance Costs.

Strict regulatory frameworks often result in higher compliance costs. These include the need to hire compliance officers, set up internal audit teams, and maintain specific financial reserves. On the other hand, lighter regulatory jurisdictions may offer reduced compliance costs but could leave you vulnerable to regulatory risks.

3. Investor Confidence.

A jurisdiction with a strong regulatory framework can boost investor confidence, especially for institutional clients who prefer stringent oversight. This can be a decisive factor in gaining the trust of high-net-worth individuals or pension funds.

 

Taxation and Financial Considerations in Different Jurisdictions

Taxation can significantly affect your profitability. Here are some tax considerations.

  1. Corporate Tax Rates: Look for jurisdictions that offer low or zero corporate taxes. The Cayman Islands, for instance, has no corporate taxes.
  2. Tax Treaties: Some jurisdictions, like Singapore and Switzerland, have double taxation treaties, which can be advantageous for cross-border transactions.
  3. VAT/GST: Ensure you understand whether the jurisdiction imposes VAT or GST on financial services.
  4. Capital Gains Tax: Jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands do not impose capital gains tax, making them attractive for asset management firms handling large investments.

 

Benefits and Challenges of Offshore and Onshore Licenses

Offshore asset management licenses could be associated with next-mentioned.

  1. Benefits: Offshore jurisdictions often offer lower taxes, less stringent regulatory oversight, and faster licensing procedures.
  2. Challenges: Offshore jurisdictions sometimes carry the stigma of being tax havens, which can deter institutional clients or raise red flags with regulators in other countries.

 

We can consider next-mentioned as for onshore asset management licenses.

  1. Benefits: Onshore licenses in well-regulated jurisdictions (e.g., the UK, Switzerland) boost investor confidence and offer a higher level of legitimacy.
  2. Challenges: The primary downside is the cost: onshore jurisdictions tend to have higher compliance, operational, and tax costs.

 

Tips for a Successful Asset Management License Application

Successfully obtaining an asset management license can be a complex process. Here are some practical tips.

  1. Prepare a Strong Business Plan: Regulatory authorities will expect a detailed business plan that outlines your company's objectives, management structure, and compliance procedures.
  2. Hire a Local Advisor: Jurisdiction-specific advisors can help you navigate local regulatory requirements and ensure that your application meets all necessary criteria.
  3. Ensure Compliance: Create a robust compliance framework, including AML/KYC-policies, as these are often required in many jurisdictions.
  4. Demonstrate Financial Stability: Most regulators require proof of sufficient capital reserves to ensure the firm's financial stability.
  5. Prepare for Audits: Many jurisdictions require regular audits. Have a system in place to ensure transparency and compliance with financial regulations.

In conclusion, choosing the right jurisdiction for your asset management license requires careful consideration of multiple factors: regulation, reputation, taxation, and operational ease. By understanding these key elements and preparing adequately, you can select a jurisdiction that aligns with your business goals while ensuring long-term success.

Article’s author is Denys Chernyshov - founder and CEO of the leading international law firm Eternity Law International.